The marketplace is rolling out industry collections as editorial layers for real workflows, not as fake taxonomy theater. Categories and frameworks still do the structural work. Industry exists here to make discovery sharper, faster, and easier to trust.
Launch the strongest shelves first
Keep the copy practical, not hypey
Expand only where the catalog earns it
Browse the collections
Jump straight into the strongest shelves
🎙️ Wave 1
Media & Publishing Systems
8 picks
This is the easiest shelf to understand because the jobs are concrete and the outputs are visible. Good first spotlight material.
What belongs here: transcription, subtitles, podcast workflows, chaptering, localization, loudness cleanup, and final-mile publishing prep.
Strong because it combines document-heavy workflows with operational systems work. It feels practical instead of generic.
What belongs here: filings research, invoice extraction, billing operations, reconciliation, and reporting workflows that benefit from structure and evidence.
Wave 2 stays deliberately narrow. This shelf works when framed around documentation, paperwork, transcription, extraction, and literature support — not clinical automation claims.
What belongs here: documentation intake, OCR, transcription, structured extraction, and biomedical literature support for paperwork-heavy workflows.
Editorial caveat: This collection is for documentation, intake, transcription, extraction, and literature-support workflows. It is not a claim of clinical correctness, diagnosis, or medical decision support.
The idea stays on the board, but it is not live because the current shortlist still feels assembled rather than earned. Better to ship one sharp Wave 2 shelf than pad the page with weak editorial stretching.
Why this page exists
Discovery, not taxonomy theater
Industry collections should make the marketplace feel more useful and more honest. If a shelf needs too much explanation, it should wait.