Skill Detail

Run human-in-the-loop academic research workflows with Academic Research Skills

Use Academic Research Skills to guide Claude Code through research planning, literature review, drafting, review, revision, citation checks, and publication preparation.

Research & ScrapingClaude Code
Research & Scraping Claude Code Security Reviewed
โญ 39.4k GitHub stars
COPY SKILL INSTRUCTIONS (OPTIONAL)
npx skills add agentskillexchange/skills --skill run-human-in-the-loop-academic-research-workflows-with-academic-research-skills Copy
Uses the third-party skills CLI, not an ASE-owned installer. Check your agent’s compatibility. This copies instructions; complete the upstream tool setup below separately.
At a glance
Tools required
Claude Code; optional Pandoc/Tectonic/Python for advanced output and guard features
Install & setup
Claude Code: /plugin marketplace add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, then /plugin install academic-research-skills. Verify with /ars-plan or /ars-lit-review.
Author
Imbad0202
Publisher
Independent GitHub Maintainer
Last updated
Jul 25, 2026
Quick brief

Use Academic Research Skills when a researcher wants Claude Code to assist a paper or literature workflow without turning the agent into an unsupervised author. The suite provides skill and command surfaces for planning a paper, running literature-review workflows, drafting sections, checking writing quality, reviewing evidence, revising, and preparing outputs while keeping the human responsible for research judgment.

How it works

What this skill actually does

Invoke this instead of using normal chat when the work needs a repeatable academic pipeline: structured paper planning, citation and reference hygiene, claim support checks, review modes, style calibration, or submission-package verification. The upstream README documents concrete Claude Code plugin commands such as /ars-plan and /ars-lit-review, plus setup docs for optional Pandoc, Tectonic, Python-backed checks, and cross-model verification.

The boundary is academic research operations, not a generic writing assistant. The skill should keep the user in the loop, handle evidence and formatting chores, and surface integrity gates. It should not promise autonomous paper generation or publication without human review.